Me THUAN Dit DIEUDONNÉ, with the agreement of his clients, makes available a certain number of cases successfully treated within the framework of the law of minors.
May 17, 2022 : LOIRY v. ROMANIA
(Child abduction / wrongful removal)
View PDF
Romania again condemned by the European Court of Human Rights for violation of Article 8§1 (non-execution of final decisions ordering the return of children to France)
In the LOIRY v. ROMANIA judgment of 17 May 2022, the European Court found a violation of Article 8 § 1 of the ECHR in its procedural aspect, for not having taken the necessary and adequate measures to enforce the decision to return the applicant’s children, who had been unlawfully removed to Romania, to France.
The applicant was represented by Mr Thuan Dit Dieudonné.
May 18, 2021 : KARINE JAMBU v. FRANCE
By a final decision of May 18, 2021, the Court of Appeal of Paris recognized for the first time the responsibility of the French State in the rapes undergone by Karine JAMBU, when she was 5 years old, committed by a recidivist pedophile, because of multiple heavy faults and denial of justice on the part of the services of the State (public prosecutor’s office, police investigators, judge of the children).
We speak about it in the press:
Video about this case :
View PDF
France condemned by the European Court of Human Rights in the “Marina Sabatier” case for violation of article 3 (prohibition of torture) due to the serious failings of the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the shortcomings of the social services for child protection
This is the first time that the European Court of Human Rights has found such a violation against France and the failure of the child protection system (§ 175 of the judgment).
In this case, the Court recognized the interest of the applicant association to act and condemned France for multiple violations of article 3 of the ECHR (deficiencies of the criminal investigation, wrongful inertia of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, decision to close the case, deficiencies of the social and medico-social services, absence of communication between protection services, despite the knowledge of serious and numerous elements of mistreatment.
The applicant association was represented by the Thuan Dit Dieudonné firm.